Blizzard investor group SOC demands changes in letter
SOC demands changes to Blizzard-Activision
Blizzard-Activision investor group SOC has criticized the company's response. l Provided by Blizzard-Activision

Blizzard investor group SOC demands changes in letter

Investor group SOC has demanded changes to Blizzard-Activision's response

On Tuesday, Blizzard-Activision shareholder/investor group SOC released a letter criticizing the company’s response to recent sexual harassment and gender discrimination allegations. According to the SOC, the changes in Bobby Kotick’s response do not “go nearly far enough to address the deep and widespread issues with equity, inclusion, and human capital management” that the company is facing. The story was first reported by Megan Farokhmanesh on Axiom.

Recommended Videos

https://twitter.com/megan_nicolett/status/1425109298544267266?s=21

“Activision Blizzard shareholder/investment group SOC released a letter today demanding changes following management’s ‘inadequate response’ to the company’s ongoing culture problems,” Farokhmanesh tweeted.

What changes does the SOC demand of Activision Blizzard in their letter?

The letter demanded several changes to Bobby Kotick’s original response to the sexual harassment lawsuit. The SOC brought to light that “no changes have been announced or proposed that would in any way alter the current process for filling vacancies either to the board of directors or to senior management.” The letter specifically requests Blizzard hire a woman director with a history of advocacy for marginalized communities by the end of 2021.

The letter also raised the issue of the pay differential. The SOC noted that there have been no promises from Blizzard’s side in terms of pay cuts for involved executives. The SOC also criticized the lack of promises towards equity within the company. “Claw back bonuses from executives found to have engaged in or enabled abusive behavior, award no bonuses for 2021, and make future bonus awards contingent on the company as a whole achieving clearly articulated and independently verified milestones for diversity and equity.”

The final criticism lies with the choice of law firm that Blizzard-Activision chose for their internal review, Wilmerhale. “The announced review by Wilmer Hale is deficient in a number of ways: this firm has a sterling reputation as a defender of the wealthy and connected,” the letter from the SOC said. “But it has no track record of uncovering wrongdoing, the lead investigator does not have in-depth experience investigating workplace harassment and abuse.” The SOC has specifically asked Blizzard-Activision to conduct a company-wide Equity Review that many other companies have also done.

There is currently no response from Blizzard-Activision on the matter.

related content
Read Article Activision-Blizzard officially end deal with NetEase, no playability in China
NetEase Activision-Blizzard China
Read Article How to get the Sunwell for free in Hearthstone
The Sunwell card in Hearthstone March of the Lich King
Read Article How Undead minions work in Hearthstone March of the Lich King
Artwork of Invincible.
Read Article How the Manathirst keyword works in Hearthstone
Embers of Strength artwork
Read Article How the Corpse mechanic works in Hearthstone
Battlefield Necromancer artwork
Related Content
Read Article Activision-Blizzard officially end deal with NetEase, no playability in China
NetEase Activision-Blizzard China
Read Article How to get the Sunwell for free in Hearthstone
The Sunwell card in Hearthstone March of the Lich King
Read Article How Undead minions work in Hearthstone March of the Lich King
Artwork of Invincible.
Read Article How the Manathirst keyword works in Hearthstone
Embers of Strength artwork
Read Article How the Corpse mechanic works in Hearthstone
Battlefield Necromancer artwork
Author
Kenneth Utama
The resident Dota player of the Upcomer Team that dips his toes into League, Melee and Pokemon. A chinese-indonesian living in Vancouver, Canada. Enjoys food, fashion and movies. Just another adult who decided it would be a good idea to start their own podcast